banner



Home  ›  The Lighting Thief Chapter 1

The Lighting Thief Chapter 1

Written By Monday, October 24, 2022 Add Comment Edit

Introduction of competing electric power manual systems in the late 1880s and early on 1890s

This article is most the battle between electrical distribution methods. For the 2017 film, meet The Electric current State of war.

American inventor and businessman Thomas Edison established the first investor-owned electric utility in 1882, basing its infrastructure on DC ability.

American entrepreneur and engineer George Westinghouse introduced a rival AC-based power distribution network in 1886

The war of the currents was a series of events surrounding the introduction of competing electric ability transmission systems in the late 1880s and early on 1890s. It grew out of ii lighting systems developed in the tardily 1870s and early 1880s; arc lamp street lighting running on loftier-voltage alternating current (AC), and large-calibration low-voltage direct current (DC) indoor incandescent lighting beingness marketed by Thomas Edison'southward company.[1] In 1886, the Edison system was faced with new contest: an alternating electric current system adult by George Westinghouse's company that used transformers to pace down from a high voltage so AC could be used for indoor lighting. Using high voltage allowed an Ac arrangement to transmit power over longer distances from more efficient large fundamental generating stations. Every bit the utilise of AC spread rapidly, the Edison Electric Low-cal Company claimed in early 1888 that loftier voltages used in an alternating current organization were hazardous, and that the blueprint was junior to, and infringed on the patents behind, their directly current system.

In the spring of 1888, a media furor arose over electrical fatalities caused by pole-mounted loftier-voltage Ac lines, attributed to the greed and callousness of the arc lighting companies that used them. In June of that year Harold P. Brown, a New York electrical engineer, claimed the AC-based lighting companies were putting the public at take chances using loftier-voltage systems installed in a slipshod manner. Brown also claimed that alternating electric current was more dangerous than direct current and tried to prove this by publicly killing animals with both currents, with technical assistance from Edison Electrical. The Edison company and Dark-brown colluded further in their parallel goals to limit the use of Ac with attempts to push through legislation to severely limit Air-conditioning installations and voltages. Both too colluded with Westinghouse's primary AC rival, the Thomson-Houston Electric Company, to brand sure the beginning electrical chair was powered by a Westinghouse AC generator.

By the early on 1890s the war was winding downwards. Further deaths caused past AC lines in New York City forced electric companies to set up safety problems. Mergers reduced competition between companies, including the merger of Edison Electrical with their chief AC rival, Thomson-Houston, forming Full general Electric in 1892. The new company now controlled iii quarters of the United states of america electrical business.[two] [iii] Westinghouse won the bid to supply electrical ability for the World'due south Columbian Exposition in 1893 and won the major part of the contract to build Niagara Falls hydroelectric projection later that year (partially splitting the contract with General Electrical). DC commercial power distribution systems declined quickly in numbers throughout the 20th century; the terminal DC system in New York Metropolis was shut down in 2007.

Background [edit]

Very bright arc lighting (such as this one in 1882 New York) could just be used outdoors or in large indoor spaces where they could be mounted high out of people's sight line.

The state of war of the currents grew out of the development of two lighting systems; arc lighting running on alternating current and incandescent lighting running on straight current.[1] Both were supplanting gas lighting systems, with arc lighting taking over large surface area/street lighting, and incandescent lighting replacing gas for business and residential indoor lighting.

Arc lighting [edit]

Past the tardily 1870s, arc lamp systems were beginning to be installed in cities, powered past central generating plants. Arc lighting was capable of lighting streets, factory yards, or the interior of big buildings. Arc lamp systems used high voltages (above 3,000 volts) to supply electric current to multiple serial-connected lamps,[4] and some ran better on alternate current.[five]

1880 saw the installation of large-scale arc lighting systems in several US cities including a cardinal station set up upward by the Brush Electrical Company in December 1880 to supply a 2-mile (three.2 km) length of Broadway in New York City with a 3,500–volt demonstration arc lighting system.[half dozen] [vii] The disadvantages of arc lighting were: it was maintenance intensive, buzzed, flickered, constituted a fire hazard, was really only suitable for outdoor lighting, and, at the loftier voltages used, was dangerous to piece of work with.[eight]

Edison's DC company [edit]

Workmen burial Edison DC power lines under the streets in New York Metropolis in 1882. This costly do played to Edison's favor in public perceptions afterward several deaths were caused by overhead loftier voltage AC lines.[9]

In 1878 inventor Thomas Edison saw a market for a system that could bring electric lighting directly into a customer's business or domicile, a niche not served by arc lighting systems.[10] By 1882 the investor-endemic utility Edison Illuminating Company was established in New York City. Edison designed his utility to compete with the then established gas lighting utilities, basing information technology on a relatively low 110-volt direct current supply to power a high resistance incandescent lamp he had invented for the arrangement. Edison direct current systems would be sold to cities throughout the United states of america, making it a standard with Edison controlling all technical development and holding all the cardinal patents.[eleven] Straight current worked well with incandescent lamps, which were the main load of the 24-hour interval. Direct-current systems could exist directly used with storage batteries, providing valuable load-leveling and backup power during interruptions of generator performance. Straight-current generators could be easily paralleled, assuasive economical operation by using smaller machines during periods of light load and improving reliability. Edison had invented a meter to let customers to be billed for energy proportional to consumption, just this meter worked simply with straight current. Straight electric current also worked well with electric motors, an reward DC held throughout the 1880s. The primary drawback with the Edison direct electric current system was that it ran at 110 volts from generation to its final destination giving it a relatively short useful transmission range: to keep the size of the expensive copper conductors down generating plants had to exist situated in the middle of population centers and could just supply customers less than a mile from the plant.

AC transformer evolution in Europe [edit]

Alternate current had been under evolution with contributions by Guillaume Duchenne (1850s), the dynamo work of Zénobe Gramme, Ganz Works (1870s), Sebastian Ziani de Ferranti (1880s), Lucien Gaulard, and Galileo Ferraris. Starting in the 1880s alternate current gained its key advantage over straight current with the evolution of functional transformers that immune the voltage to be "stepped upwards" to much college manual voltages and then dropped down to a lower end user voltage for business concern and residential use.[12] The high voltages immune a central generating station to supply a big area, up to 7-mile (11 km) long circuits.[13]

Using consecration coils to transfer power betwixt electrical circuits had been around for 40 years with Pavel Yablochkov using them in his lighting system in 1876 and Lucien Gaulard and John Dixon Gibbs using the principle to create a "pace down" transformer in 1882, but the design was not very efficient.[14] A epitome of the loftier efficiency, airtight core shunt connectedness transformer was made past the Hungarian "Z.B.D." squad (composed of Károly Zipernowsky, Ottó Bláthy and Miksa Déri) at Ganz Works in 1884.[15] [sixteen] The new Z.B.D. transformers were 3.iv times more than efficient than the open core bipolar devices of Gaulard and Gibbs.[17] Transformers in employ today are designed based on principles discovered by the three engineers.[eighteen] Their patents included another major related innovation: the utilize of parallel connected (as opposed to serial connected) power distribution.[16] [19] Ottó Bláthy too invented the showtime AC electricity meter.[20] [21] [22] [23] The reliability of this blazon of Air conditioning engineering received impetus after the Ganz Works electrified Rome, a big metropolis, in 1886.[24]

Westinghouse enters the AC business [edit]

Westinghouse Electric Company 1888 catalog advertizement their "Alternating System".

In North America the inventor and entrepreneur George Westinghouse entered the electric lighting business concern in 1884 when he started to develop a DC system and hired William Stanley, Jr. to work on information technology. Westinghouse became aware of the new European transformer based Air conditioning systems in 1885 when he read about them in the UK technical periodical Applied science.[25] He grasped that AC combined with transformers meant greater economies of scale could be achieved with large centralized power plants transmitting stepped up voltage very long distances to be used in arc lighting equally well as lower voltage home and commercial incandescent lighting supplied via a "step down" transformer at the other terminate. Westinghouse saw a way to build a truly competitive system instead of just building another barely competitive DC lighting system using patents but different plenty to get effectually the Edison patents.[26] The Edison DC system of centralized DC plants with their brusk transmission range as well meant there was a patchwork of united nations-supplied customers betwixt Edison's plants that Westinghouse could easily supply with AC power.

William Stanley adult the first practical AC transformer for Westinghouse and helped build the first AC systems.

Westinghouse purchased the United states patents rights to the Gaulard-Gibbs transformer and imported several of those besides as Siemens Ac generators to brainstorm experimenting with an AC-based lighting organization in Pittsburgh. William Stanley used the Gaulard-Gibbs pattern and designs from the ZBD Transformer to develop the first practical transformer. The Westinghouse Electrical Company was formed at the beginning of 1886. In March 1886 Stanley, with Westinghouse's backing, installed the first multiple-voltage AC power system, a demonstration incandescent lighting system, in Great Barrington, Massachusetts.[27] Expanded to the point where it could light 23 businesses along main street with very petty ability loss over 4000 feet, the arrangement used transformers to stride 500 AC volts at the street down to 100 volts to power incandescent lamps at each location.[28] By fall of 1886 Westinghouse, Stanley, and Oliver B. Shallenberger had congenital the first commercial Air conditioning power arrangement in the The states in Buffalo, New York.

The spread of AC [edit]

Past the end of 1887 Westinghouse had 68 alternating electric current power stations to Edison'southward 121 DC-based stations. To make matters worse for Edison, the Thomson-Houston Electric Company of Lynn, Massachusetts (some other competitor offering Air-conditioning- and DC-based systems) had congenital 22 power stations.[ix] Thomson-Houston was expanding their business while trying to avert patent conflicts with Westinghouse, arranging deals such as coming to agreements over lighting company territory, paying a royalty to use the Stanley Ac transformer patent, and allowing Westinghouse to apply their Sawyer-Human incandescent bulb patent. Also Thomson-Houston and Brush there were other competitors at the fourth dimension included the The states Illuminating Company and the Waterhouse Electric Light Company. All of the companies had their own electric ability systems, arc lighting systems, and even incandescent lamp designs for domestic lighting, leading to abiding lawsuits and patent battles between themselves and with Edison.[29]

Rubber concerns [edit]

The myriad of telephone, telegraph, and power lines over the streets of New York City in a photo of the Great Blizzard of 1888. An Air-conditioning charged broken wire from the tempest led to the electrocution of a male child that jump.

Elihu Thomson of Thomson-Houston was concerned about AC safety and put a great bargain of endeavor into developing a lightning arrestor for loftier-tension ability lines every bit well as a magnetic blowout switch that could shut the system downward in a power surge, a safety feature the Westinghouse arrangement did non have.[30] Thomson likewise worried virtually what would happen with the equipment afterward they sold it, assuming customers would follow a risky practice of installing as many lights and generators as they could go away with. He also thought the idea of using Air conditioning lighting in residential homes was too dangerous and had the visitor concord back on that blazon of installation until a safer transformer could be developed.[31]

Due to the hazards presented past high voltage electric lines nigh European cities and the city of Chicago in the United states of america required them to be buried underground.[32] The City of New York did not require burying and had little in the manner of regulation so past the terminate of 1887 the hodgepodge of overhead wires for phone, telegraph, burn and burglar alert systems in Manhattan were at present mixed with haphazardly strung AC lighting system wires carrying up to 6,000 volts.[33] Insulation on power lines was rudimentary, with one electrician referring to information technology as having equally much value "as a molasses covered rag", and exposure to the elements was eroding it over time.[32] A 3rd of the wires were simply abandoned by defunct companies and slowly deteriorating, causing damage to, and shorting out the other lines. Also being an eyesore, New Yorkers were annoyed when a large March 1888 snowstorm (the Great Blizzard of 1888) tore down a large number of the lines, cutting off utilities in the metropolis. This spurred on the idea of having these lines moved underground merely it was stopped by a court injunction obtained by Western Union. Legislation to give all the utilities 90 days to move their lines into underground conduits supplied by the city was slowly making its mode through the authorities just that was also beingness fought in court by the U.s.a. Illuminating Company, who claimed their Air-conditioning lines were perfectly condom.[33] [34]

Edison'due south anti-AC stance [edit]

Every bit AC systems continued to spread into territories covered by DC systems, with the companies seeming to impinge on Edison patents including incandescent lighting, things got worse for the company. The price of copper was rise, adding to the expense of Edison'south low voltage DC system, which required much heavier copper wires than higher voltage Air-conditioning systems. Thomas Edison's own colleagues and engineers were trying to become him to consider AC. Edison's sales force was continually losing bids in municipalities that opted for cheaper Air-conditioning systems[35] and Edison Electric Illuminating Company president Edward Hibberd Johnson pointed out that if the company stuck with an all DC system it would not exist able to exercise business organisation in pocket-sized towns and even mid-sized cities.[36] Edison Electrical had a patent selection on the ZBD transformer, and a confidential in house report recommended that the company go AC, simply Thomas Edison was against the idea.

Afterward Westinghouse installed his first large scale organization, Edison wrote in a November 1886 individual letter of the alphabet to Edward Johnson, "Just as sure as decease Westinghouse will kill a customer within six months later on he puts in a system of any size, He has got a new thing and it will require a great deal of experimenting to become it working practically."[37] Edison seemed to agree a view that the very high voltage used in AC systems was also unsafe and that information technology would take many years to develop a safe and workable organization.[38] Safety and fugitive the bad press of killing a client had been one of the goals in designing his DC system[39] and he worried that a death caused by a mis-installed AC system could concord back the employ of electricity in general.[38] Edison's understanding of how AC systems worked seemed to be extensive. He noted what he saw as inefficiencies and that, combined with the upper-case letter costs in trying to finance very large generating plants, led him to believe there would be very piffling toll savings in an AC venture.[xl] Edison was also of the stance that DC was a superior system (a fact that he was certain the public would come up to recognize) and junior Air conditioning technology was beingness used past other companies as a way to go around his DC patents.[41]

In February 1888 Edison Electric president Edward Johnson published an 84-page pamphlet titled "A Warning from the Edison Electric Light Visitor" and sent it to newspapers and to companies that had purchased or were planning to purchase electrical equipment from Edison competitors, including Westinghouse and Thomson-Houston, stating that the competitors were infringing on Edison's incandescent lite and other electrical patents.[42] It warned that purchasers could find themselves on the losing side of a court case if those patents were upheld. The pamphlet as well emphasized the safety and efficiency of direct current, with the claim DC had not caused a single death, and included newspaper stories of adventitious electrocutions caused by alternating current.

Execution past electricity [edit]

As arc lighting systems spread so did stories of how the high voltages involved were killing people, commonly unwary linemen, a strange new miracle that seemed to instantaneously strike a victim dead.[43] One such story in 1881 of a drunken dock worker dying after he grabbed a large electric dynamo led Buffalo, New York dentist Alfred P. Southwick to seek some application for the curious phenomenon.[44] He worked with local md George Due east. Fell and the Buffalo ASPCA, electrocuting hundreds of stray dogs, to come upwardly with a method to euthanize animals via electricity.[45] Southwick's 1882 and 1883 articles on how electrocution could be a replacement for hanging, using a restraint like to a dental chair (an electric chair)[46] defenseless the attention of New York State politicians who, following a series of botched hangings, were badly seeking an alternative. An 1886 commission appointed past New York governor David B. Hill, which including Southwick, recommended in 1888 that executions exist carried out by electricity using the electric chair.[47]

There were early indications that this new class of execution would become mixed upward with the war of currents. As role of their fact-finding, the commission sent out surveys to hundreds of experts on law and medicine, seeking their opinions, every bit well as contacting electrical experts, including Elihu Thomson and Thomas Edison.[48] In belatedly 1887, when death penalty commission member Southwick contacted Edison, the inventor stated he was confronting death sentence and wanted nothing to do with the matter. After further prompting, Edison hit out at his chief electric power competitor, George Westinghouse, in what may have been the opening salvo in the war of currents, stating in a December 1887 letter of the alphabet to Southwick that it would be best to utilise electric current generated by "'alternating machines,' manufactured principally in this land by Geo. Westinghouse".[49] Presently subsequently the execution by electricity bill passed in June 1888, Edison was asked by a New York government official what ways would be the all-time style to implement the country'due south new course of execution. "Rent out your criminals every bit linemen to the New York electric lighting companies" was Edison's natural language-in-cheek answer.[50] [51]

Anti-AC backfire [edit]

As the number of deaths attributed to high voltage lighting around the state continued to mount, a cluster of deaths in New York Urban center in the bound of 1888 related to AC arc lighting prepare off a media frenzy against the "mortiferous arc-lighting electric current"[52] and the seemingly draconian lighting companies that used it.[53] [54] These deaths included a xv-year-old boy killed on April fifteen by a broken telegraph line that had been energized with alternating current from a United States Illuminating Company line; a clerk killed two weeks later past an Air conditioning line; and a Brush Electrical Company lineman killed in May by the AC line he was cutting. The press in New York seemed to switch overnight from stories about electric lights vs gas lighting to "death by wire" incidents, with each new report seeming to fan public resentment against high voltage AC and the dangerously tangled overhead electric wires in the city.[33] [53]

Harold Dark-brown's cause [edit]

Electrical engineer Harold Pitney Brown emerged in June 1888 as an anti-AC crusader.

At this point an electric engineer named Harold P. Brown, who at that time seemed to take no connectedness to the Edison company,[55] sent a June 5, 1888 letter to the editor of the New York Post challenge the root of the problem was the alternating electric current (Air conditioning) system existence used. Brown argued that the AC system was inherently dangerous and "damnable" and asked why the "public must submit to constant danger from sudden death" just then utilities could utilize a cheaper Ac organization.

At the kickoff of attacks on Air-conditioning, Westinghouse, in a June 7, 1888 letter, tried to defuse the situation. He invited Edison to visit him in Pittsburgh and said "I believe there has been a systemic attempt on the part of some people to do a nifty deal of mischief and create as great a divergence as possible betwixt the Edison Company and The Westinghouse Electrical Co., when there ought to exist an entirely dissimilar status of affairs". Edison thanked him but said "My laboratory work consumes the whole of my time".[56]

On June 8, Brown was lobbying in person before the New York Board of Electrical Control, asking that his letter to the newspaper be read into the meeting's tape and demanding severe regulations on AC including limiting voltage to 300 volts, a level that would brand Air-conditioning adjacent to useless for transmission. At that place were many rebuttals to Chocolate-brown'due south claims in the newspapers and letters to the board, with people pointing out he was showing no scientific show that Ac was more dangerous than DC. Westinghouse pointed out in letters to various newspapers the number of fires caused past DC equipment and suggested that Brownish was apparently being controlled by Edison, something Brown continually denied.

A July edition of The Electrical Journal covered Brown's advent before the New York Board of Electric Command and the contend in technical societies over the merits of DC and AC and noted that:[42] [57]

The battle of the currents is being fought this week in New York.

At a July meeting Board of Electrical Command, Brownish'south criticisms of Ac and even his cognition of electricity was challenged by other electrical engineers, some of whom worked for Westinghouse. At this coming together, supporters of AC provided anecdotal stories from electricians on how they had survived shocks from Air-conditioning at voltages up to chiliad volts and argued that DC was the more dangerous of the two.[58]

Brown's demonstrations [edit]

Brown, determined to evidence alternating current was more dangerous than direct current, at some bespeak contacted Thomas Edison to run across if he could make use of equipment to comport experiments. Edison immediately offered to aid Brownish in his crusade against Air-conditioning companies. Before long, Dark-brown was loaned space and equipment at Edison'southward West Orange, New Bailiwick of jersey laboratory, as well as laboratory banana Arthur Kennelly.

Brown paid local children to collect devious dogs off the street for his experiments with direct and alternating current.[59] After much experimentation killing a serial of dogs, Brown held a public demonstration on July 30 in a lecture room at Columbia College.[60] With many participants shouting for the demonstration to stop and others walking out, Brown subjected a caged dog to several shocks with increasing levels of directly electric current up to ane,000 volts, which the canis familiaris survived. Brown so applied 330 volts of alternate current which killed the domestic dog. Iv days subsequently he held a 2d sit-in to answer critics' claims that the DC probably weakened the dog before information technology died. In this second demonstration, three dogs were killed in quick succession with 300 volts of Ac.[61] Chocolate-brown wrote to a colleague that he was sure this demonstration would get the New York Lath of Electric Command to limit AC installations to 300 volts. Brown's campaign to restrict Air conditioning to 300 volts was unsuccessful only legislation did come close to passing in Ohio and Virginia.[62]

Collusion with Edison [edit]

What brought Brown to the forefront of the fence over Air-conditioning and his motives remain unclear,[55] only historians note at that place grew to exist some form of collusion betwixt the Edison visitor and Chocolate-brown.[55] [63] Edison records seem to show it was Edison Electric Light treasurer Francis Southward. Hastings who came upwards with the thought of using Chocolate-brown and several New York physicians to assault Westinghouse and the other AC companies in retaliation for what Hastings idea were unscrupulous bids by Westinghouse for lighting contracts in Denver and Minneapolis.[62] Hasting brought Dark-brown and Edison together[64] and was in continual contact with Dark-brown.[62] Edison Electrical seemed to be footing the bill for some of Brown's publications on the dangers of Ac.[65] In addition, Thomas Edison himself sent a letter of the alphabet to the city government of Scranton, Pennsylvania recommending Brown as an expert on the dangers of AC.[61] Some of this collusion was exposed in messages stolen from Dark-brown's office and published in August 1889.

Patents and mergers [edit]

Nikola Tesla's consecration motor patent was acquired by Westinghouse in July 1888 with plans to incorporate it in a completely integrated AC system.

During this menses Westinghouse continued to pour money and engineering resources into the goal of building a completely integrated AC system. To proceeds command of the Sawyer-Man lamp patents he bought Consolidated Electric Lite in 1887. He bought the Waterhouse Electric Light Visitor in 1888 and the United States Illuminating Company in 1890, giving Westinghouse their own arc lighting systems also as control over all the major incandescent lamp patents non controlled by Edison.[66] In Apr 1888 Westinghouse engineer Oliver B. Shallenberger developed an induction meter that used a rotating magnetic field for measuring alternating electric current, giving the company a style to calculate how much electricity a client used.[67] In July 1888 Westinghouse paid a substantial amount to license Nikola Tesla'southward US patents for a poly-stage Ac consecration motor[68] and obtained a patent pick on Galileo Ferraris' induction motor design.[69] Although the acquisition of a feasible Air-conditioning motor gave Westinghouse a fundamental patent in building a completely integrated Air conditioning system, the full general shortage of greenbacks the company was going through by 1890 meant evolution had to be put on hold for a while.[lxx] The difficulties of obtaining funding for such a capital intensive business was becoming a serious trouble for the company and 1890 saw the outset of several attempts by investor J. P. Morgan to take over Westinghouse Electrical.[71] [72]

Thomson-Houston was continuing to expand, buying seven smaller electric companies including a purchase of the Brush Electric Visitor in 1889.[73] By 1890 Thomson-Houston controlled the bulk of the arc lighting systems in the U.s. and a collection of its own US Ac patents. Several of the business deals betwixt Thomson-Houston and Westinghouse barbarous autonomously and in April 1888 a judge rolled back part of Westinghouse's original Gaulard Gibbs patent, stating information technology only covered transformers linked in series.[73]

With the help of the financier Henry Villard the Edison group of companies also went through a series of mergers: Edison Lamp Visitor, a lamp manufacturer in E Newark, New Bailiwick of jersey; Edison Machine Works, a manufacturer of dynamos and big electrical motors in Schenectady, New York; Bergmann & Company, a manufacturer of electrical lighting fixtures, sockets, and other electrical lighting devices; and Edison Electrical Light Visitor, the patent-holding visitor and the financial arm backed by J.P. Morgan and the Vanderbilt family unit for Edison's lighting experiments, merged.[74] The new visitor, Edison General Electrical Company, was formed in January 1889 with the help of Drexel, Morgan & Co. and Grosvenor Lowrey with Villard every bit president.[75] [76] It after included the Sprague Electric Railway & Motor Company.

The peak of the war [edit]

Through the fall of 1888 a battle of words with Brown specifically attacking Westinghouse connected to escalate. In November George Westinghouse challenged Chocolate-brown'southward assertion in the pages of the Electrical Engineer that the Westinghouse Ac systems had acquired 30 deaths. The magazine investigated the claim and institute at nigh only 2 of the deaths could be attributed to Westinghouse installations.[77]

Associating AC and Westinghouse with the electric chair [edit]

Although New York had a criminal procedure code that specified electrocution via an electric chair, it did not spell out the type of electricity, the amount of current, or its method of supply, since these were still relative unknowns.[78] The New York Md-Legal Society, an informal society composed of doctors and lawyers, was given the task of working out the details and in tardily 1888 through early 1889 conducted a series of animal experiments on voltage amounts, electrode design and placement, and skin conductivity. During this time they sought the advice of Harold Dark-brown as a consultant. This ended upwardly expanding the state of war of currents into the evolution of the chair and the general debate over capital punishment in the US.[50]

Subsequently the Md-Legal Society formed their committee in September 1888 chairman Frederick Peterson, who had been an assistant at Brown's July 1888 public electrocution of dogs with Air conditioning at Columbia Higher,[79] had the results of those experiments submitted to the committee. The claims that Ac was more mortiferous than DC and was the best current to use was questioned with some commission members pointing out that Chocolate-brown's experiments were not scientifically carried out and were on animals smaller than a human being existence. At their November coming together the committee recommended 3000 volts although the type of electricity, direct electric current or alternating current, was not adamant.[79]

Harold Chocolate-brown demonstrating the killing power of Air-conditioning to the New York Medico-Legal Society past electrocuting a horse at Thomas Edison'due south West Orange laboratory.

In order to more conclusively testify to the committee that Air conditioning was more deadly than DC, Brown contacted Edison Electric Calorie-free treasurer Francis Southward. Hastings to conform the use of the West Orangish laboratory.[50] There on December v, 1888 Chocolate-brown fix up an experiment with members of the printing, members of the Medico-Legal Order, the chairman of the capital punishment commission, and Thomas Edison looking on. Brown used alternating current for all of his tests on animals larger than a human, including 4 calves and a lame horse, all dispatched with 750 volts of AC.[80] Based on these results the Medico-Legal Society'south December meeting recommended the employ of 1000–1500 volts of alternating current for executions and newspapers noted the Air-conditioning used was half the voltage used in the power lines over the streets of American cities.

Westinghouse criticized these tests every bit a skewed cocky-serving sit-in designed to exist a direct attack on alternate current.[81] On December xiii in a letter of the alphabet to the New York Times, Westinghouse spelled out where Brownish's experiments were wrong and claimed again that Brownish was beingness employed by the Edison company. Chocolate-brown'southward December eighteen letter refuted the claims and Chocolate-brown even challenged Westinghouse to an electric duel, with Brownish agreeing to be shocked by ever-increasing amounts of DC power if Westinghouse submitted himself to the aforementioned amount of increasing AC power, first to quit loses.[81] Westinghouse declined the offer.

In March 1889 when members of the Medico-Legal Social club embarked on another serial of tests to work out the details of electrode composition and placement they turned to Brown for technical help.[50] [82] Edison treasurer Hastings tried unsuccessfully to obtain a Westinghouse AC generator for the test.[50] They ended up using Edison'due south West Orange laboratory for the fauna tests.

Also in March, Superintendent of Prisons Austin Lathrop asked Chocolate-brown if he could supply the equipment needed for the executions every bit well as design the electrical chair. Brownish turned downwardly the job of designing the chair merely did agree to fulfill the contract to supply the necessary electric equipment.[50] The state refused to pay upwardly front, and Chocolate-brown apparently turned to Edison Electric as well as Thomson-Houston Electric Visitor to assist obtaining the equipment. This became another behind-the-scenes maneuver to learn Westinghouse Ac generators to supply the current, apparently with the help of the Edison company and Westinghouse's chief AC rival, Thomson-Houston.[50] [83] Thomson-Houston arranged to acquire three Westinghouse AC generators past replacing them with new Thomson-Houston Ac generators. Thomson-Houston president Charles Coffin had at to the lowest degree two reasons for obtaining the Westinghouse generators; he did not want his company'due south equipment to be associated with the death sentence and he wanted to use one to prove a point, paying Brown to fix a public efficiency test to testify that Westinghouse's sales claim of manufacturing 50% more efficient generators was faux.[84]

That leap Chocolate-brown published "The Comparative Danger to Life of the Alternating and Continuous Electric Current" detailing the animal experiments done at Edison's lab and claiming they showed AC was far deadlier than DC.[85] This 61-page professionally printed booklet (probably paid for by the Edison company) was sent to authorities officials, newspapers, and businessmen in towns with populations greater than 5000 inhabitants.[65]

In May 1889 when New York had its first criminal sentenced to exist executed in the electric chair, a street merchant named William Kemmler, there was a great bargain of discussion in the editorial column of the New York Times every bit to what to telephone call the then-new form of execution. The term "Westinghoused" was put frontward as well as "Gerrycide" (after death sentence commission caput Elbridge Gerry), and "Browned".[86] The Times hated the discussion that was eventually adopted, electrocution, describing it every bit being pushed forward past "pretentious ignoramuses".[87] One of Edison's lawyers wrote to his colleague expressing an opinion that Edison'southward preference for dynamort, ampermort and electromort were not adept terms but thought Westinghoused was the best choice. [86]

The Kemmler appeal [edit]

After William Kemmler was sentenced to decease in the electric chair his appeal was financed by Westinghouse, an try to preclude Westinghouse AC generators from beingness used in an execution, by repealing the electrocution law.

William Kemmler was sentenced to die in the electric chair around June 24, 1889, but before the sentence could be carried out an appeal was filed on the grounds that it constituted brutal and unusual punishment nether the U.Southward. Constitution. It became obvious to the press and everyone involved that the politically continued (and expensive) lawyer who filed the appeal, William Bourke Cockran, had no connexion to the case but did have connection to the Westinghouse visitor, obviously paying for his services.[88]

During fact-finding hearings held around the land beginning on July nine in New York City, Cockran used his considerable skills as a cross-examiner and orator to assault Chocolate-brown, Edison, and their supporters. His strategy was to show that Dark-brown had falsified his test on the killing power of Ac and to prove that electricity would not cause certain death and only pb to torturing the condemned. In cross examination he questioned Brown'due south lack of credentials in the electrical field and brought up possible collusion between Chocolate-brown and Edison, which Brown once again denied. Many witnesses were called by both sides to give immediate anecdotal accounts virtually encounters with electricity and evidence was given by medical professionals on the human body'south nervous organisation and the electrical conductivity of skin. Brown was defendant of fudging his tests on animals, hiding the fact that he was using lower current DC and high-current Air conditioning.[89] When the hearing convened for a 24-hour interval at Edison's West Orange lab to witness demonstrations of skin resistance to electricity, Brown almost got in a fight with a Westinghouse representative, accusing him of being in the Edison laboratory to deport industrial espionage.[ninety] Newspapers noted the oftentimes contradictory testimony was raising public doubts virtually the electrocution law simply after Edison took the stand many accepted assurances from the "sorcerer of Menlo Park" that 1000 volts of Ac would easily kill any man.[91]

After the gathered testimony was submitted and the two sides presented their case, Judge Edwin Mean solar day ruled confronting Kemmler'due south entreatment on October ix and US Supreme Court denied Kemmler's entreatment on May 23, 1890.[92]

When the chair was offset used, on August 6, 1890, the technicians on manus misjudged the voltage needed to kill William Kemmler. After the first jolt of electricity Kemmler was found to be still breathing. The procedure had to be repeated and a reporter on hand described it as "an awful spectacle, far worse than hanging." George Westinghouse commented: "They would have washed amend using an axe."[93]

Brown'south collusion exposed [edit]

On Baronial 25, 1889 the New York Sun ran a story headlined:

"For Shame, Brown! – Disgraceful Facts About the Electric Killing Scheme; Queer Work for a State'south Practiced; Paid past Ane Electrical Company to Injure Some other"

The story was based on 45 letters stolen from Chocolate-brown'south role that spelled out Dark-brown'south bunco with Thomson-Houston and Edison Electric. The majority of the letters were correspondence between Dark-brown and Thomson-Houston on the topic of acquiring the three Westinghouse generators for the state of New York as well as using one of them in an efficiency test. They besides showed that Brown had received $5,000 from Edison Electric to purchase the surplus Westinghouse generators from Thomson-Houston. Further Edison involvement was contained in letters from Edison treasurer Hastings asking Chocolate-brown to send anti-Air conditioning pamphlets to all the legislators in the state of Missouri (at the company'due south expense), Brown requesting that a letter of recommendation from Thomas Edison be sent to Scranton, PA, as well as Edison and Arthur Kennelly coaching Brown in his upcoming testimony in the Kemmler appeal trial.[83] [94] [95]

Brown was not slowed down by this revelation and characterized his efforts to expose Westinghouse as the same every bit going after a grocer who sells toxicant and calls it carbohydrate.[83] [94] [95]

The "Electric Wire Panic" [edit]

The death of Western Union Lineman John Feeks led to laws finally existence passed to move Ac lines underground in New York City.

1889 saw another round of deaths attributed to alternate electric current including a lineman in Buffalo, New York, four linemen in New York City, and a New York fruit merchant who was killed when the display he was using came in contact with an overhead line. NYC Mayor Hugh J. Grant, in a coming together with the Board of Electric Control and the Air-conditioning electric companies, rejected the claims that the Ac lines were perfectly safe saying "we get news of all who touch them through the coroners part".[33] On October 11, 1889, John Feeks, a Western Marriage lineman, was loftier upwardly in the tangle of overhead electric wires working on what were supposed to be low-voltage telegraph lines in a busy Manhattan district. As the lunchtime crowd below looked on he grabbed a nearby line that, unknown to him, had been shorted many blocks away with a high-voltage Air-conditioning line. The jolt entered through his bare right hand and exited his left steel studded climbing boot. Feeks was killed almost instantly, his body falling into the tangle of wire, sparking, burning, and smoldering for the improve part of an hour while a horrified oversupply of thousands gathered beneath. The source of the power that killed Feeks was not determined although United States Illuminating Company lines ran nearby.[96]

Feeks' public decease sparked a new circular of people fearing the electric lines over their heads in what has been called the "Electric Wire Panic".[97] The arraign seemed to settle on Westinghouse since, Westinghouse having bought many of the lighting companies involved, people assumed Feeks' death was the fault of a Westinghouse subsidiary.[97] Newspapers joined into the public outcry following Feeks' expiry, pointing out men'south lives "were cheaper to this monopoly than insulated wires" and calling for the executives of AC companies to be charged with manslaughter. The October 13, 1889, New Orleans Times-Picayune noted "Decease does not stop at the door, but comes right into the house, and mayhap as you are closing a door or turning on the gas you are killed."[98] Harold Dark-brown's reputation was rehabilitated about overnight with newspapers and magazines seeking his opinion and reporters following him around New York City where he measured how much current was leaking from Air-conditioning power lines.[99]

The expiry of Feeks marked the first time Edison publicly denounced alternating current.

At the summit of the war of currents, Edison himself joined the public debate for the first time, denounced Air-conditioning electric current in a November 1889 commodity in the Due north American Review titled "The Dangers of Electric Lighting". Edison put forward the view that burying the loftier-voltage lines was not a solution, and would but move the deaths surreptitious and be a "abiding menace" that could short with other lines threatening people's homes and lives.[96] [100] He stated the only way to make AC safe was to limit its voltage and vowed Edison Electric would never adopt Air-conditioning every bit long every bit he was in accuse.[96]

George Westinghouse was of a sudden put in the function of a villain trying to defend pole-mounted AC installations that he knew were unsafe and fumbled at reporters' questions trying to signal out all the other things in a large metropolis that were more dangerous.[97] [96] The next month he did meliorate in his response printed in the N American Review, pointing out that his Air conditioning/transformer system actually used lower household voltages than the Edison DC system. He as well pointed out 87 deaths in one yr caused by street cars and gas lighting versus but 5 accidental electrocutions and no in-dwelling deaths attributed to AC current.[96]

The crowd that watched Feeks contained many New York aldermen due to the site of the blow beingness virtually the New York government offices and the horrifying affair galvanized them into the action of passing the law on moving utilities underground.[101] The electric companies involved obtained an injunction preventing their lines from existence cut down immediately merely shut down most of their lighting until the state of affairs was settled, plunging many New York streets into darkness.[73] The legislation ordering the cutting downwards of all of the utility lines was finally upheld by the New York Supreme Court[ which? ] in December. The Air-conditioning lines were cutting down keeping many New York City streets in darkness for the rest of the winter since little had been washed past the overpaid Tammany Hall urban center supervisors who were supposed to come across to building the hole-and-corner "subways" to house them.[100]

The current war ends [edit]

Even with the Westinghouse propaganda losses, the state of war of currents itself was winding down with direct current on the losing side. This was due in office to Thomas Edison himself leaving the electrical power business.[102] Edison was condign marginalized in his own company having lost majority control in the 1889 merger that formed Edison General Electric.[103] In 1890 he told president Henry Villard he idea it was time to retire from the lighting business and moved on to an iron ore refining project that preoccupied his fourth dimension.[3] Edison'due south dogmatic anti-Air conditioning values were no longer decision-making the company. Past 1889 Edison's Electrical's own subsidiaries were lobbying to add Air conditioning power manual to their systems and in October 1890 Edison Machine Works began developing Ac-based equipment.

With Thomas Edison no longer involved with Edison Full general Electrical, the war of currents came to a close with a financial merger.[104] Edison president Henry Villard, who had engineered the merger that formed Edison General Electric, was continually working on the idea of merging that company with Thomson-Houston or Westinghouse. He saw a existent opportunity in 1891. The market was in a general downturn causing cash shortages for all the companies concerned and Villard was in talks with Thomson-Houston, which was now Edison General Electric's biggest competitor. Thomson-Houston had a habit of saving money on development by buying, or sometimes stealing, patents. Patent conflicts were stymieing the growth of both companies and the idea of saving on some 60 ongoing lawsuits likewise every bit saving on profit losses of trying to undercut each other by selling generating plants below toll pushed frontward the idea of this merger in financial circles.[three] [103] Edison hated the idea and tried to hold information technology off simply Villard thought his company, now winning its incandescent light patent lawsuits in the courts, was in a position to dictate the terms of whatever merger.[3] Every bit a commission of financiers, which included J.P. Morgan, worked on the deal in early 1892 things went against Villard. In Morgan'due south view Thomson-Houston looked on the books to be the stronger of the 2 companies and engineered a backside the scenes bargain appear on April xv, 1892, that put the direction of Thomson-Houston in control of the new company, at present called Full general Electric (dropping Edison's name). Thomas Edison was non aware of the bargain until the day before information technology happened.

The fifteen electric companies that existed five years before had merged down to two; General Electric and Westinghouse. The war of currents came to an terminate and this merger of the Edison company, along with its lighting patents, and the Thomson-Houston, with its Air conditioning patents, created a company that controlled three quarters of the Us electrical business concern.[2] [3] From this point on General Electric and Westinghouse were both marketing alternating current systems.[105] Edison put on a dauntless face noting to the media how his stock had gained value in the bargain but privately he was biting that his visitor and all of his patents had been turned over to the competition.[2]

Backwash [edit]

Even though the institutional state of war of currents had concluded in a financial merger, the technical difference betwixt directly and alternating current systems followed a much longer technical merger.[104] Due to innovation in the U.s. and Europe, alternating current's economic system of scale with very large generating plants linked to loads via long-altitude transmission was slowly existence combined with the ability to link it up with all of the existing systems that needed to be supplied. These included unmarried phase AC systems, poly-phase Air-conditioning systems, low voltage incandescent lighting, high voltage arc lighting, and existing DC motors in factories and street cars. In the engineered universal arrangement these technological differences were temporarily being bridged via the development of rotary converters and motor–generators that allowed the large number of legacy systems to exist connected to the Air conditioning grid.[105] [104] These stopgaps were slowly replaced as older systems were retired or upgraded.

In May 1892 Westinghouse Electric managed to underbid General Electric on the contract to electrify the Earth'due south Columbian Exposition in Chicago and, although they made no profit, their demonstration of a safe and effective highly flexible universal alternating electric current organisation powering all of the disparate electrical systems at the Exposition led to them winning the bid at the end of that yr to build an Ac power station at Niagara Falls. Full general Electric was awarded contracts to build AC transmission lines and transformers in that project and farther bids at Niagara were split with GE who were quickly communicable up in the AC field[2] due partly to Charles Proteus Steinmetz, a Prussian mathematician who was the first person to fully sympathise AC ability from a solid mathematical standpoint. General Electric hired many talented new engineers to improve its blueprint of transformers, generators, motors and other apparatus.[106]

A three-phase 3-wire transmission organisation had already been deployed in Europe at the International Electro-Technical Exhibition of 1891, where Mikhail Dolivo-Dobrovolsky used this system to transmit electric power over a distance of 176 km with 75% efficiency. In 1891 he as well created a three-phase transformer, the brusk-circuited (squirrel-muzzle) consecration motor and designed the globe'due south beginning 3-phase hydroelectric power plant.

Patent lawsuits were still hampering both companies and bleeding off cash, so in 1896, J. P. Morgan engineered a patent sharing agreement betwixt the ii companies that remained in strength for 11 years.[107]

In 1897 Edison sold his remaining stock in Edison Electric Illuminating of New York to finance his iron ore refining prototype found.[108] In 1908 Edison said to George Stanley, son of Air conditioning transformer inventor William Stanley, Jr., "Tell your begetter I was wrong", probably albeit he had underestimated the developmental potential of alternate current.[109]

Remnant and existent DC systems [edit]

Some cities continued to apply DC well into the 20th century. For instance, central Helsinki had a DC network until the late 1940s, and Stockholm lost its dwindling DC network as late equally the 1970s. A mercury-arc valve rectifier station could convert AC to DC where networks were all the same used. Parts of Boston, Massachusetts, along Beacon Street and Commonwealth Avenue still used 110 volts DC in the 1960s, causing the devastation of many small appliances (typically hair dryers and phonographs) used by Boston Academy students, who ignored warnings about the electricity supply.

New York City's electric utility company, Consolidated Edison, continued to supply straight electric current to customers who had adopted information technology early in the twentieth century, mainly for elevators. The New Yorker Hotel, constructed in 1929, had a large straight-current power plant and did non convert fully to alternate-electric current service until well into the 1960s.[110] This was the building in which Air conditioning pioneer Nikola Tesla spent his last years, and where he died in 1943. New York Metropolis'south Broadway theaters connected to employ DC services until 1975, requiring the apply of outmoded manual resistance dimmer boards operated by several stagehands. This practise ended when the musical A Chorus Line introduced computerized lighting control and thyristor (SCR) dimmers to Broadway, and New York theaters were finally converted to Air-conditioning.[111]

In January 1998, Consolidated Edison started to eliminate DC service. At that time there were 4,600 DC customers. By 2006, there were only 60 customers using DC service, and on Nov fourteen, 2007, the last direct-current distribution by Con Edison was close down. Customers all the same using DC were provided with on-site Air-conditioning to DC rectifiers.[112] Pacific Gas and Electric Visitor even so provides DC power to some locations in San Francisco, primarily for elevators, supplied by close to 200 rectifiers each providing power for vii–10 customers.[113]

The Central Electricity Generating Lath in the UK maintained a 200–volt DC generating station at Bankside Power Station in London until 1981. It exclusively powered DC printing machinery in Fleet Street, then the heart of the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland'due south paper industry. Information technology was decommissioned subsequently in 1981 when the newspaper industry moved into the developing docklands surface area further downwardly the river (using modern AC-powered equipment).

High-voltage direct current (HVDC) systems are used for bulk transmission of energy from distant generating stations or for interconnection of separate alternating-current systems.

Encounter also [edit]

  • Format war
  • History of electric power transmission
  • History of electronic engineering
  • Timeline of electrical and electronic engineering
  • Topsy (elephant) – in popular culture associated with the war of currents

References [edit]

Citations
  1. ^ a b Skrabec (2012), p. 86.
  2. ^ a b c d Essig (2009), p. 268.
  3. ^ a b c d east Bradley (2011), pp. 28–29.
  4. ^ "Charles Francis Brush". Archived from the original on September xvi, 2018. Retrieved December v, 2018.
  5. ^ Jonnes (2003), p. 47.
  6. ^ "Charles Francis Castor". Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Archived from the original on February 24, 2009. Retrieved January 4, 2009.
  7. ^ "Brush Arc Lamps". Electric Museum.com.
  8. ^ "Arc Lamps – How They Work & History". Edison Tech Center. 2015.
  9. ^ a b Bradley (2011).
  10. ^ Rockman (2004), p. 131.
  11. ^ McNichol (2006), p. 80.
  12. ^ McNichol (2006), p. 81.
  13. ^ "Notes on the Jablochkoff Organisation of Electric Lighting". Journal of the Gild of Telegraph Engineers. Society of Telegraph Engineers. Nine (32): 143. March 24, 1880. Retrieved January 7, 2009.
  14. ^ "History of Transformers". Edison Tech Center. 2014.
  15. ^ Halacsy, A. A.; Von Fuchs, 1000. H. (April 1961). "Transformer Invented 75 Years Ago". IEEE Transactions of the American Constitute of Electrical Engineers. 80 (3): 121–125. doi:10.1109/AIEEPAS.1961.4500994. S2CID 51632693.
  16. ^ a b "Bláthy, Ottó Titusz". National Technical Data Eye and Library. Budapest University of Technology and Economics. Retrieved February 29, 2012.
  17. ^ Jeszenszky, Sándor. "Electrostatics and Electrodynamics at Pest Academy in the Mid-19th Century" (PDF). Academy of Pavia . Retrieved March 3, 2012.
  18. ^ Nagy, Árpád Zoltán (Oct xi, 1996). "Lecture to Marker the 100th Anniversary of the Discovery of the Electron in 1897 (preliminary text)". Budapest. Retrieved July 9, 2009.
  19. ^ "Hungarian Inventors and Their Inventions". Institute for Developing Culling Energy in Latin America. Archived from the original on March 22, 2012. Retrieved March 3, 2012.
  20. ^ Katz, Eugenii. "Blathy". Clarkson University. Archived from the original on June 25, 2008. Retrieved Baronial four, 2009.
  21. ^ Ricks, 1000.W.D. (March 1896). "Electricity Supply Meters". Journal of the Establishment of Electrical Engineers. 25 (120): 57–77. doi:10.1049/jiee-1.1896.0005. Educatee paper read on Jan 24, 1896, at the Students' Coming together.
  22. ^ The Electrician, Volume 50, 1923.
  23. ^ Official gazette of the United States Patent Part, Volume fifty. (1890)
  24. ^ "Ottó Bláthy, Miksa Déri, Károly Zipernowsky". IEC Techline. Archived from the original on December 6, 2010. Retrieved April 16, 2010.
  25. ^ Moran (2007), p. 42.
  26. ^ Carlson, W. Bernard (2013). Tesla: Inventor of the Electrical Age. Princeton, New Bailiwick of jersey: Princeton Academy Press. p. 89. ISBN978-0-69116-561-5.
  27. ^ Great Barrington Historical Society, Great Barrington, Massachusetts.
  28. ^ "The Swell Barrington Electrification, 1886". Edison Tech Center. 2014.
  29. ^ Skrabec (2007), p. 97.
  30. ^ Davis, L. J. (2012). Armada Fire: Thomas Edison and the Pioneers of the Electrical Revolution. New York: Skyhorse Publishing. ISBN978-one-61145-659-2.
  31. ^ Higonnet, Landes & Rosovsky (1991), p. 89.
  32. ^ a b Essig (2009), p. 137.
  33. ^ a b c d Klein (2010), p. 263.
  34. ^ Essig (2009), p. 139.
  35. ^ Stross (2007), p. 171.
  36. ^ Jonnes (2003), pp. 144–145.
  37. ^ Klein (2010), p. 257.
  38. ^ a b Jonnes (2003), p. 146.
  39. ^ Stross (2007), p. 174.
  40. ^ Carlson, W. Bernard (1993). "Contest and Consolidation in the Electrical Manufacturing Manufacture, 1889–1892" (PDF). Technological Competitiveness: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives on Electrical, Electronics, and Calculator Industries. Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE Printing. pp. 287–311.
  41. ^ Stross (2007), pp. 171–174.
  42. ^ a b Essig (2009), p. 135.
  43. ^ Stross (2007), pp. 171–173.
  44. ^ Brandon (1999), pp. 12–xiv.
  45. ^ Brandon (1999), p. 21.
  46. ^ Brandon (1999), p. 24.
  47. ^ "Southwick, Alfred Porter". American National Biography Online.
  48. ^ Brandon (1999), pp. 54 & 57–58.
  49. ^ Jonnes (2003), p. 420.
  50. ^ a b c d east f 1000 Reynolds, Terry S.; Bernstein, Theodore (March 1989). "Edison and "The Chair"" (PDF). Technology and Society. Vol. 8, no. i. Found of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
  51. ^ "Thomas Alva Edison". Scientific American. 87 (26): 463. December 27, 1902. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican12271902-463.
  52. ^ Stross (2007), pp. 172.
  53. ^ a b Jonnes (2003), p. 143.
  54. ^ Essig (2009), pp. 139–140.
  55. ^ a b c Jonnes (2003), p. 166.
  56. ^ Jonnes (2003), p. 167.
  57. ^ The Electrical Journal, Book 21, July 21, 1888, p.415.
  58. ^ Essig (2009), p. 141.
  59. ^ Jonnes (2003), p. 173.
  60. ^ Rockman (2004), p. 469.
  61. ^ a b Jonnes (2003), p. 174.
  62. ^ a b c Carlson, W. Bernard (2003). Innovation as a Social Process: Elihu Thomson and the Ascent of General Electrical. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p. 285. ISBN978-0-52153-312-6.
  63. ^ Brandon (1999), pp. 70 & 261.
  64. ^ Klein (2010), Chapter 13.
  65. ^ a b Essig (2009), p. 157.
  66. ^ Klein (2010), p. 281.
  67. ^ Seifer, Marc (one May 1998). Sorcerer: The Life And Times of Nikola Tesla. Citadel. ISBN978-0-8065-3556-2 – via Google Books.
  68. ^ Klooster, John West. (1 January 2009). Icons of Invention: The Makers of the Mod World from Gutenberg to Gates. ABC-CLIO. ISBN978-0-313-34743-six – via Google Books.
  69. ^ Jonnes (2003).
  70. ^ Skrabec (2007), p. 127.
  71. ^ Skrabec (2007), pp. 128–130.
  72. ^ Skrabec, Quentin R. (2010). The World's Richest Neighborhood: How Pittsburgh'south East Enders Forged American Industry. New York: Algora Publishing. ISBN978-0-87586-795-iii.
  73. ^ a b c Klein (2010), p. 292.
  74. ^ "Electricity". A Brief History of Con Edison. Con Edison. Retrieved 3 February 2013.
  75. ^ Wredge, Charles D.; Greenwood, Ronald 1000. (1984). "William E. Sawyer and the Rising and Fall of America'due south Start Incandescent Electric Light Visitor, 1878–1881" (PDF). Business and Economic History. Business History Briefing. 2 (13): 31–48. Retrieved Dec 27, 2011.
  76. ^ Israel, Paul (1998). Edison: A Life of Invention . New York: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 173–174, 178. ISBN0-471-52942-7.
  77. ^ Moran (2007), p. 118.
  78. ^ Moran (2007), pp. 102–104.
  79. ^ a b Moran (2007), p. 102.
  80. ^ Essig (2009), pp. 152–155.
  81. ^ a b Brandon (1999), p. 82.
  82. ^ Essig (2009), p. 225.
  83. ^ a b c Essig (2009), pp. 190–195.
  84. ^ Essig (2009), pp. 193.
  85. ^ Moran (2007), p. 106.
  86. ^ a b Moran (2007), pp. xxi–xxii.
  87. ^ Moran (2007), p. xxii.
  88. ^ Brandon (1999), p. 101.
  89. ^ Brandon (1999), p. 119.
  90. ^ Brandon (1999), p. 115.
  91. ^ Brandon (1999), p. 125.
  92. ^ McNichol (2006), p. 120.
  93. ^ McNichol (2006), p. 125.
  94. ^ a b Penrose, James F. (1994). "Inventing Electrocution". American Heritage of Invention & Engineering science. 9 (four): 34–44. PMID 11613165. Archived from the original on February 25, 2015.
  95. ^ a b Jonnes (2003), pp. 191–198.
  96. ^ a b c d e Stross (2007), p. 179.
  97. ^ a b c Klein (2010).
  98. ^ Essig (2009), pp. 217.
  99. ^ Essig (2009), p. 218.
  100. ^ a b Jonnes (2003), p. 200.
  101. ^ Stross (2007), p. 178.
  102. ^ Hughes (1993), pp. 125–126.
  103. ^ a b Sloat, Warren (1979). 1929: America Before the Crash. New York: Macmillan. p. 316. ISBN978-0-02611-800-two.
  104. ^ a b c Hughes (1993), pp. 120–121.
  105. ^ a b Garud, Raghu; Kumaraswamy, Arun; Langlois, Richard (2009). Managing in the Modular Historic period: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons. p. 249. ISBN978-1-40514-194-9.
  106. ^ The General Electric Story, The Hall of History.
  107. ^ Skrabec (2007), p. 190.
  108. ^ Freeberg, Ernest (2013). The Historic period of Edison: Electric Calorie-free and the Invention of Modern America. New York: The Penguin Press. ISBN978-1-59420-426-5.
  109. ^ Higonnet, Landes & Rosovsky (1991), p. 113.
  110. ^ Blalock, Tom (23 January 2006). "Powering the New Yorker: A Hotel'due south Unique Direct Current System". Power and Energy. Vol. 4, no. one. IEEE. doi:x.1109/MPAE.2006.1578536.
  111. ^ Blalock, Tom (Oct 2002). "History and reflections on the manner things were: Edison'south Direct Current Influenced "Broadway" Prove Lighting". Ability and Engineering Review. Vol. 22, no. 10. IEEE. ISSN 0272-1724.
  112. ^ Lee, Jennifer (November 16, 2007). "Off Goes the Power Current Started by Thomas Edison". The New York Times . Retrieved November xvi, 2007.
  113. ^ Fairley, Peter (15 November 2012). "San Francisco's Cloak-and-dagger DC Grid". IEEE Spectrum.
Bibliography
  • Bradley, Robert L. Jr. (2011). Edison to Enron: Energy Markets and Political Strategies. New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN978-0-47091-736-7.
  • Brandon, Craig (1999). The Electric Chair: An Unnatural American History. Jefferson, North.C.: McFarland & Co. ISBN978-0-58538-476-4.
  • Essig, Mark (2009). Edison and the Electric Chair: A Story of Light and Decease. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA. ISBN978-0-80271-928-7.
  • Higonnet, Patrice 50. R.; Landes, David Due south.; Rosovsky, Henry (1991). Favorites of Fortune: Engineering, Growth, and Economic Evolution Since the Industrial Revolution. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Academy Press. ISBN978-0-67429-520-9.
  • Hughes, Thomas Parke (1993). Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Social club, 1880–1930 . Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN978-0-80182-873-7.
  • Jonnes, Jill (2003). Empires of Light: Edison, Tesla, Westinghouse, and the Race to Electrify the Earth. New York: Random Firm. ISBN978-0-37550-739-7.
  • Klein, Maury (2010). The Power Makers: Steam, Electricity, and the Men Who Invented Modern America. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing U.s.. ISBN978-1-59691-834-iv.
  • McNichol, Tom (2006). Ac/DC: The Savage Tale of the First Standards War. New York: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN978-0-7879-8267-half-dozen.
  • Moran, Richard (2007). Executioner'due south Electric current: Thomas Edison, George Westinghouse, and the Invention of the Electric Chair. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Grouping. ISBN978-0-37572-446-half dozen.
  • Rockman, Howard B. (2004). Intellectual Holding Law for Engineers and Scientists. Wiley-IEEE Press. ISBN978-0-471-44998-0.
  • Skrabec, Quentin R. (2007). George Westinghouse: Gentle Genius. New York: Algora Publishing. ISBN978-0-87586-404-four.
  • Skrabec, Quentin R. (2012). The 100 Well-nigh Pregnant Events in American Business organisation: An Encyclopedia. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. ISBN978-0-31339-863-6.
  • Stross, Randall Due east. (2007). The Wizard of Menlo Park: How Thomas Alva Edison Invented the Mod World. New York: Crown Publishers. ISBN978-ane-40004-762-8.

Further reading [edit]

  • Berton, Pierre (1997). Niagara: A History of the Falls. New York: Kodansha International. ISBN978-ane-56836-154-3.
  • Bordeau, Sanford P. (1982). Volts to Hertz—the rise of electricity: from the compass to the radio through the works of xvi great men of science whose names are used in measuring electricity and magnetism. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Burgess Pub. Co. ISBN978-0-80874-908-0.
  • Edquist, Charles; Hommen, Leif; Tsipouri, Lena J. (2000). Public technology procurement and innovation. Economic science of science, technology, and innovation. Vol. sixteen. Boston: Kluwer Bookish. ISBN978-0-79238-685-viii.
  • "A new system of alternating electric current motors and transformers". The Electrical Engineer. London, United kingdom: Biggs & Co.: 568–572 May 18, 1888.
  • "Practical electrical problems at Chicago". The Electric Engineer. London, UK: Biggs & Co.: 458–459, 484–485 & 489–490 May 12, 1893.
  • Foster, Abram John (1979). The Coming of the Electric Age to the U.s.a.. New York: Arno Printing. ISBN978-0-40511-983-five.

External links [edit]

  • "Thomas Edison Hates Cats". Pinky Show. Jan 17, 2007. (AC vs DC an online video mini-history).
  • "War of the Currents". PBS.
  • Chang, Maria. "War of the Currents". University of California at Berkeley. Archived from the original on July 26, 2011.

The Lighting Thief Chapter 1,

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_the_currents

Posted by: thayerwitify.blogspot.com

0 Response to "The Lighting Thief Chapter 1"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel